2009年6月1日星期一

Why China Isn’t “The Next Silicon Valley”

 
 

via TechCrunch by Sarah Lacy on 6/1/09

forbiddendragonsmallSince I got home from China last week, I’ve found myself in a lot of conversations where phrases like “the next Silicon Valley” or “just like Silicon Valley used to be” keep coming up. But while China is swimming in capital and littered with start-ups, I’m going to argue it’s not the next Silicon Valley. In fact, it’s something far different than I’ve ever seen before.

If you think about it, Silicon Valley doesn’t really move as fast as people say it does. Sure, the rest of the U.S. business world may feel out-lapped by the pattern of companies going from nothing to billions in a few years, but those start-ups are mostly the outliers. For every wunderkind smirking on the cover of a magazine, there are far more entrepreneurs who slogged away for thirty years before ever getting their Nasdaq moments. And there are even more who slogged away for longer and didn’t.

And even the breakout Googles and Facebooks of the Valley had the clear benefit of building their companies on top of decades of infrastructure build-out. I mean “infrastructure” in the sense of technology infrastructure—the chips, routers, open source stack, etc.— but I also mean it in the sense of Valley infrastructure that makes it possible to come up with an idea at breakfast and have a company by noon. It’s taken decades of continual boom-and-bust cycles to create the complex fabric of venture capitalists, angel investors, lawyers, term sheets, accounting methods and best practices that a newby entrepreneur waltzing in the Valley today has the luxury of taking for granted.

What makes China so staggering is that everything that happened to corporate America over decades—think the television and media studios build out of the 1950s, the greed of the 1980s, the dot com bubble, the build out of physical and IT infrastructure, current Web 2.0 and CleanTech innovation—is all happening to China at once.

Imagine: At the same time eCommerce is getting sea legs, TV Home Shopping is also getting hot. Online ads are growing not because people are TiVoing through commercials—both TV and online ads are growth markets at the same time. Ditto for entertainment and piracy: While Hollywood sees the Internet as a threat to its cozy legacy business, China’s entertainment industry is just now building amid a world where piracy is already rampant. No one assumes anyone will buy a CD, so they just look for other ways to make money. The wonder of China right now isn’t just the size of the market. It’s the rate at which dozens of “old” and “new” economies are all maturing amid one another, and the hyper-network effects that such economic progress is having throughout the country.

As for China’s start-up ecosystem , it’s working to build its own Valley-like infrastructure, but it doesn’t have the luxury of growing it steadily over several decades. Experts say there’s at least $20 billion in venture capital sloshing around the country right now. It’s probably double that if you count angels and unofficial or very local funds, says Rocky Lee of DLA Piper, a law firm that represents much of that venture money in China.

That’s why calling China merely “the next Silicon Valley” misses the singularity of what’s happening there. The Valley has never been like this, and I don’t say that to knock the Valley. In many ways,  our steady development has been healthier. But it’s also a lot less electric. In the next ten years or so way more money will be lost amid the China chaos, but I’m betting way more money will be made too.

It reminds me of the distinction between start-ups who develop products in “parallel” and those who develop them in “serial.” In the former, you raise a bunch of money, hire an army of coders and develop your whole vision at once. In the latter, you build one product, prove that one works and can make money, then raise more money to develop a second. Typically in a time of economy plenty and investor froth everyone pushes for parallel. When the funding and revenues get tight, the serial approach comes into vogue. Parallel is always more exciting; serial is always more rational.

Silicon Valley tends to develop start-ups in “serial waves,” if you will. There are always outliers and waves can coincide in timing like CleanTech and Web 2.0 did, but investors and entrepreneurs tend to jump on dominant high-growth bandwagons and ride them until a few billion companies come out of them and many more fail. Then they wait for the next wagon.

China, as a country, is developing in parallel. The wagons are running constantly and going in nearly every direction. It’s a time of chaos that can burn people out, but it’s also one so unique in the history of modern economics that many ambitious people can’t ignore it. That’s why most transplants from the West who survive their first two years in China tend to stay for more than ten.

Given all this, China is a lot more inwardly focused than other places like Israel and Europe where start-ups have to be global from day one to have a big enough addressable market. When it comes to the Web and mobile, the biggest surprises will likely come from local, non-English speaking entrepreneurs, maybe even those outside the largest cities. They probably don’t read TechCrunch and may not even know where Silicon Valley is on a map. But that won’t matter, because their local market will necessarily develop very differently than ours.

And while China gets a rap for ripping off U.S. Web start-ups now, I think we’re going to start seeing U.S. start-ups copying a lot of elements of Chinese entrepreneurs’ business plans, whether it’s unlocking the value in virtual goods, experimenting with alternative online payment methods or developing more social forms of e-commerce, where like-minded friends shop together.

You always find the best ideas within atmospheres of constraints. It’s why some of the best companies are started during recessions. It’s why Israel was such a surprising hot-bed for Nasdaq IPOs in the late 1990s. And it’s why Chinese Web companies have come up with other ways of making money than just slapping ads on a site, because they had to.

I’ll be going back to China in October, and I’m learning Mandarin in the meantime. Because odds are the next great grinning Web coverboy may not speak English. (And for the commenters who keep complaining that India isn’t getting enough TechCrunch love, calm down! I’ll be there most of November.)

Crunch Network: CrunchBase the free database of technology companies, people, and investors

Posted via email from devilboyiq

Tungle.me Makes Scheduling And Calendar Sharing More Social

 
 

via TechCrunch by Leena Rao on 6/1/09

Syncing calendars and scheduling meetings over email can be an arduous and annoying task. I’ve often wished that I could just send my calendar to contacts instead of going back and forth over email, so we could find a mutual time that works best for various schedules more quickly. Tungle, a scheduling and calendar sharing tool we wrote about during its launch last year, has made scheduling a meeting a whole lot more social and simple through its Tungle.Me technology.

Tungle offers users Tungle Accelerate, a free web-based application that lets you share calendars across companies and platforms, schedule meetings with individuals or groups inside or outside their company and propose multiple meeting times in invitations. The service currently syncs with Outlook, Google Calendar, Apple iCal, Entourage for Mac, and soon Lotus Notes.

Tungle’s latest technology, Tungle.Me, a “click to meet” application that is integrated with Tungle Accelerate, makes inbound scheduling more social. Once you create a Tungle account, you can also create a Tungle.me URL (you can include this link in an email or message and anyone can click on it) which you can send to contacts. At that site, contacts will input their name and email to verify their identity, then choose an available time to meet with you. Your calendar (which is synced via Tungle) will appear so that contacts can choose an open time. The spots where you have meetings are blocked off. Once a contact requests a meeting, you are sent an email with potential times for meetings. You can accept the meeting time (your calendar will be updated upon approval), send the contact another meeting time or you can deny the meeting all together. If you add meetings into your calendar that are synced with Tungle, your Tungle.me link is updated in real-time. And contacts who request a meeting don’t have to be Tungle users to use the Tungle.me interface.

Your Tungle.me link can also be embedded as a widget in an email or on a site as well as added as a Facebook widget on your profile. The widgets display a real-time glance of a users’ availability and a quick link to their personal Tungle.me URL.

The widget is a great idea, but I’m not so sure I’d want to give Facebook users and all of my friends the ability schedule a meeting with me. There is also the potential for random people, who you don’t know, to spam your email with meeting requests. Of course, you can always deny these meetings but it’s still annoying to sort though random emails in the first place.

But the service itself is a innovative idea and could save users, especially those who have frequent daily and weekly meetings but don’t have a personal assistant or secretary, a lot of time when it comes to scheduling those meetings. And the ability for your Tungle calendar to be synced with Outlook, Google Calendar and other popular scheduling applications makes the service compelling. Tungle’s main competitors are TimeBridge, which also lets you publish your calendar to selected users, and Jiffle.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

Posted via email from devilboyiq

Your Father’s Day Gift Idea: ShirtsMyWay.com

 
 

via TechCrunch by Sarah Lacy on 6/1/09

tcshirtsmywayphotoYou guys didn’t think I’d go to China and forget to bring you back something, did you? Sillies.

My last day in Shanghai I met with Peter Crawfurd and Michael Yang the baby-faced founders of ShirtsMyWay.com. (Pictured here.) ShirtsMyWay allows you to customize a men’s dress shirt with trillions of possible combinations of details, from the material on the collar to the stitching around the buttonholes. Shanghai-based tailors whip it up, and it’s mailed out to you for $65-$95, including international-shipping.

Right now, the site is running a buy-two-get-one-free Father’s Day special, but TechCrunch readers are getting an additional 10% off their entire orders placed before June 7. Because they aren’t normally set up for this kind of promotion (ahem, I was a little pushy about it all), you have to email your name and the promo code “TechCrunch 10%” to support@shirtsmyway.com within an hour of placing the order to get the discount.

So here’s the bad news for some of you: Right now, the site only makes shirts for men, although the guys awkwardly measured me on a hutong in Shanghai to make me the first-ever women’s shirt. (I still haven’t gotten it, so no word on the results.) For other ladies out there, I figure this is at least a good idea for a cheap and very personalized Father’s Day gift.

Crawfurd and Yang haven’t raised any outside capital to date, and this wasn’t the easiest business to start-up. It took Crawfurd more than a year to find the right tailors and fabrics. Meanwhile, Yang tried twice to outsource the building of the site itself and both times was disappointed, so finally he rebuilt it all himself. In February 2009, they finally launched.

Apparently, it’s going well. In April, they sold about 300 shirts, and with just a handful of employees they break even on way less than that. (They wouldn’t let me say how much less, but it’s substantially less.) Every once in a while, it’s nice to see a business model that doesn’t need huge volumes to work, isn’t it?

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Posted via email from devilboyiq

谷歌准备进军电子书领域?

 
 

via 读写网唯一官方中文站 by 译言 on 6/1/09

根据纽约时报(link)今天早上的一篇报道,谷歌正准备通过为发行方提供直销的基础构架的方式打入电子书市场。纽约时报报道称谷歌上周末在纽约的书展(BookExpo)上与出版公司讨论了这一意向。根据纽约时报的报道,谷歌最感兴趣的是为发行方提供一种可以直销的基础架构(我们猜可能不会使用谷歌的Checkout来操作),但是也没有理由相信谷歌不会推出某种形式的网络商店,或许它会以谷歌极具争议的服务——谷歌图书(Google Books)为基础。

与亚马逊竞争

发行商可能会很乐意看到亚马逊的竞争者越来越多,亚马逊通过补贴人为地将电子书的价格维持在9.99美元的低价位上,亚马逊将电子书的低价格作为了促销自己Kindle电子书阅读器的一种手段。通过自己的Kindle,亚马逊成为最流行的专用电子书阅读器,将第二名索尼的电子书阅读器远远落在了后面。根据纽约时报,谷歌会允许发行方以自己喜欢的价格对电子书收费。

谷歌能提供一种惊艳的用户体验吗?

只要亚马逊的收费比出版商的低,只要亚马逊为用户提供出众的端对端体验,那么即便像谷歌这样的大公司想突入这个市场也很难。当然,随着越来越多的电子书阅读器进入这个市场,亚马逊能否保住市场领导地位以及谷歌是否能够提供一种惊艳的用户体验还不得而知。

根据纽约时报的报道判断,用户会使用他们的浏览器来访问和阅读图书。考虑到谷歌强调它将使用HTML5制作产品,这点说的通了,但是多数读者可能会更喜欢专门的阅读器,而不是将书缓存在浏览器中(谷歌已经为iPhone和Android的用户提供了浏览器版本的谷歌图书服务link)。至于谷歌是否会支持像ePub这样的开源电子书格式还是使用自己的格式还不清楚。

背景:谷歌图书

谷歌进入这个市场的意向可以从谷歌图书和谷歌图书和解协议(中文link)中看到。根据公司与出版方达成的协议,谷歌可以将一本印刷图书20%的内容展示出来,但是当消费者继续继续阅读,并在谷歌上浏览该书后购买此书,谷歌会得到一点推荐费。如果谷歌可以直接销售电子书的话,那么它赚得钱会多得多。

另一方面,能在电子书市场看到亚马逊的一些强力竞争对手也是一件好事,要知道今年四月份的时候亚马逊已经收购了(link)iPhone上第二大的电子书开发商Lexcycle。另外一方面,需要着重提醒的是,谷歌图书(Google Book)已经对互联网图书形成了自己垄断。毕竟,谷歌图书已经免费提供150万本版权过期的图书。

(译者:Moon.Wong)

Posted via email from devilboyiq

Chicken Meat: Organic Acids, Plant Extracts And Irradiation Combine To Beat ...

 
 


A mixture of some organic acids and some extracts from plants turns out to be enough to greatly reduce pathogenic bacteria on chicken breast meat. Add some irradiation to the mix and it makes a lethal combination against the bacteria.

Posted via email from devilboyiq

Anemia Associated With Greater Risk Of Death In Heart Disease Patients

 
 


A new study has found that the presence of anemia in patients with chronic heart failure is associated with a significantly increased risk of death. The findings also show that anemia is associated with a poorer degree of left ventricular function and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, an objective measure of cardiac function.

Posted via email from devilboyiq

Realistic Picture Of Dementia: Video Can Help Patients Make End-of-life Deci...

 
 


Viewing a video showing a patient with advanced dementia may help elderly patients plan for end-of-life care, according to a new study. The investigators found that participants who watched such a video in addition to listening to a verbal description of the condition were more likely choose receiving comfort care if they developed advanced dementia and also felt the video was helpful to their decision-making process.

Posted via email from devilboyiq